Action Apartments Association, Inc.

Facebook Twitter RSS

  • 01/03/2020 6:15 PM | Margaret Fulton (Administrator)

    As discussed in Part 1 of our article two weeks ago (https://smmirror.com/2019/12/is-our-city-council-riding-a-trojan-horse), Santa Monica will be required by state law to add 9,000 units, including 6,900 affordable within 8 years – increasing our current population 20%! But our city’s track record to date is not stellar – doubling the goal of market-rate housing while requiring 30% affordable units, but only realizing 10%.

    Read More: https://smmirror.com/2020/01/is-our-city-riding-a-trojan-horse-part-2/

  • 01/02/2020 8:00 AM | Margaret Fulton (Administrator)

    From a lengthy court battle over the future of elections in Santa Monica to city officials grappling with a growing homelessness crisis, 2019 was a busy year in the Santa Monica news cycle. Here is a look back on the 10 biggest stories of 2019 in Santa Monica as the year comes to a close.

    Read More: https://smmirror.com/2019/12/top-10-santa-monica-stories-of-2019/

  • 01/02/2020 7:57 AM | Margaret Fulton (Administrator)

    Several new las take effect on January 1 in Santa Monica including maximizing the minimum wage, limiting work hours for some hotel employees and universal application of rules banning plastic food containers.

    Read More: https://s3.amazonaws.com/smdp_backissues/010120.pdf

  • 12/30/2019 9:32 AM | Margaret Fulton (Administrator)

    An Unelected Group With No Real Power, That's Who

    But perhaps a more fundamental question than how Santa Monica is going to see the construction of an additional nine-thousand-plus housing units is why we should have to do so. Who and what is the Southern California Association of Governments, and why do they have the power to command the building of housing units?

    Read More: https://www.smobserved.com/story/2019/12/27/news/who-says-santa-monica-has-to-build-9000-housing-units-an-unelected-group-with-no-real-power-thats-who/4355.html

  • 12/30/2019 9:28 AM | Margaret Fulton (Administrator)

    The good news last year for many Californians who happen to live near light rail stations and heavily traveled bus routes was that the most controversial legislative proposal of 2019 suffered an early demise in the springtime.

    The bad news for the same folks is that the same proposal, known in 2019 as SB 50, will be back in 2020, probably with a different number. The essence of this proposal is simple: Its backers, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, are convinced that mandating dense high rise construction near rapid transit stops and the busiest bus routes will go far toward solving California’s housing shortage. Exact details of the next version of the densifying plan are not yet known, but it’s clear the basics will be the same.

    Read More: https://smmirror.com/2019/12/return-of-sb50-good-or-bad-for-your-health/

  • 12/30/2019 9:26 AM | Margaret Fulton (Administrator)

    by SM.a.r.t.

    For several years, SMa.r.t. (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow ) has been promoting the notable advantages of a low-rise city composed primarily of buildings no higher than 4 stories. In this article from exactly four years ago, our colleague Mario Fonda-Bonardi explained in detail the benefits of a low-rise city, and the quality of life issues that arise with taller buildings. With the new state requirements for massive increases in the City’s number of apartments, this information becomes more relevant than ever.

    As the noted architect Christopher Alexander said in his book A Pattern Language:

    “At three or four stories, one can still walk comfortably down to the street, and from a window you can still feel part of the street scene: you can see details in the street, the people, their faces, foliage, shops. From three stories you can yell out, and catch the attention of someone below. Above four stories these connections break down. The visual detail is lost; people speak of the scene below as if it were a game, from which they are completely detached. The connection to the ground and to the fabric of the town becomes tenuous; the building becomes a world of its own: with its own elevators and cafeterias.”

    Why a low rise city?

    Read More: https://smmirror.com/2019/12/the-virtues-of-a-low-rise-city/


  • 12/23/2019 9:29 AM | Margaret Fulton (Administrator)

    The demand for housing is becoming louder and infinite. But is this tsunami real or a myth, a Trojan horse? Following is a 2 part article exploring this endless need and questioning the alarming lack of wisdom and foresight on the part of our City Council, Planning Commission and staff. Part 1 will look at our city’s kneejerk reaction to the overall housing issue by allowing developers to build taller and denser and more profitable buildings!! Part 2 will offer a realistic and we think far more creative solution.

    By way of background, recently SCAG, the Southern California Association of Governments, in their infinite wisdom, has basically doubled Santa Monica’s share of new housing over the next 8 years – from 5,000 to 9,000 units, representing a 20% increase in population with over half of the units being affordable.

    Read More: https://smmirror.com/2019/12/is-our-city-council-riding-a-trojan-horse/

  • 12/23/2019 9:25 AM | Margaret Fulton (Administrator)

    nless the numbers change, there is little chance Santa Monica can lower its State-mandated target of building more than 9,000 new housing units -- more than two-thirds affordable -- over the next decade, experts say.

    No longer can cities lower their targets by trading or transferring the units to other jurisdictions, accordng to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), which sets the targets for the region. 

    Read More: http://www.surfsantamonica.com/ssm_site/the_lookout/news/News-2019/December-2019/12_20_2019_Housing_Targets_Would_Be_Difficult_to_Contest.html

  • 12/19/2019 10:08 AM | Angelica Jue (Administrator)

    Nine low-income tenants displaced after the run-down SRO apartments they lived in near the Santa Monica Pier caught fire four years ago have won a $1 million settlement, their attorneys announced Monday.

    The 2016 lawsuit claims the property owner kept the 16 upstairs units at 1605 Ocean Front Walk, known as the Overlook Hotel, in an uninhabitable and unsafe condition before a fire forced the tenants to vacate, according to the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles and Scali Rasmussen.

    Read More: http://www.surfsantamonica.com/ssm_site/the_lookout/news/News-2019/December-2019/12_17_2019_Low_Income_Santa_Monica_Tenants_Win_1_Million_Settlement.html

  • 12/19/2019 10:03 AM | Angelica Jue (Administrator)

    A program to guarantee Santa Monica renters legal representation would cost up to $1 million per year, officials said.

    The City Council voted last week to develop an ordinance that would provide free legal counsel to tenants faced with eviction. Councilmember Sue Himmelrich said Tuesday that she and Mayor Kevin McKeown introduced the proposal after learning that Pico Lanai Apartments, a 174-unit complex in Santa Monica’s rapidly gentrifying Pico neighborhood, had been sold for $59 million to investment firm Pacific Reach Properties.

    Read More: https://www.smdp.com/universal-legal-representation-for-renters-would-cost-up-to-1-million/184016

Copyright ©2024 ACTION Apartment Association, Inc.

Equal Opportunity Housing
Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software