Action Apartments Association, Inc.

Facebook Twitter RSS

  • 06/12/2019 7:23 AM | ACTION (Administrator)

    Newly empowered Democrats are trying to address concern over housing costs that is helping to drive the debate over inequality.

    Members of the Upstate Downstate Housing Alliance held a rally at the State Capitol this month demanding legislators pass universal rent control in New York.CreditHans Pennink/Associated Press

    Image

    Members of the Upstate Downstate Housing Alliance held a rally at the State Capitol this month demanding legislators pass universal rent control in New York.CreditCreditHans Pennink/Associated Press

    Luis Ferré-SadurníJesse McKinleyVivian Wang

    By Luis Ferré-Sadurní, Jesse McKinley and Vivian Wang

    June 11, 2019

    Newly empowered Democratic leaders in Albany announced a landmark agreement on Tuesday to strengthen New York’s rent laws and tenant protections, seeking to address concern about housing costs that is helping drive the debate over inequality across the nation.

    The changes would abolish rules that let building owners deregulate apartments, close a series of loopholes that permit them to raise rents and allow some tenant protections to expand statewide.

    The deal was a significant blow to the real estate industry, which contended that the measures would lead to the deterioration of the condition of New York City’s housing. The industry had long been one of the most powerful lobbies in Albany, but it suffered a loss of influence after its Republican allies surrendered control of the State Senate in the November elections.

    “These reforms give New Yorkers the strongest tenant protections in history,” the Senate majority leader, Andrea Stewart-Cousins, and the Assembly speaker, Carl E. Heastie, said in a joint statement. “For too long, power has been tilted in favor of landlords and these measures finally restore equity and extend protections to tenants across the state.”

    Both chambers are expected to vote on the legislative package this week.

    The current rent regulations expire on Saturday. The new and strengthened rules would mark a turning point for the 2.4 million people who live in nearly one million rent-regulated apartments in New York City after a decades-long erosion of protections and the loss of tens of thousands of regulated apartments.

    The legislation in Albany is far-reaching: While rent regulations are currently restricted largely to New York City and a few other localities, the new package would allow cities and towns statewide to fashion their own regulations, which are meant to keep apartments affordable by limiting rent increases.

    It would also make the changes permanent — a major victory for tenant activists who have had to lobby Albany every few years when the old laws expired.

    Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, a Democrat, said he would sign whatever package of rent bills the Legislature passed.

    The imminent changes come as New York and other major cities are grappling with a shortage of affordable housing, prompting even Democratic presidential hopefuls to increasingly court renters as a new voting bloc.


    New York has seen record numbers in homelessness statewide and skyrocketing rents that have acutely burdened low-income and older residents. “The Senate and the Assembly are taking a massive step in the right direction,” said Cea Weaver, the campaign coordinator of Housing Justice for All, a statewide coalition of tenants.

    “We have a long way to go to reach a point where every tenant in New York is protected, but this is a big step forward to correct decades of injustice between tenants and landlords,” she added.

    Real estate trade groups called the proposed legislation an existential threat to building owners. In hearings and through expensive ad campaigns, the groups warned that the changes could put small landlords out of business because they would be unable to increase rents to deal with escalating costs.

    “This legislation fails to address the city’s housing crisis and will lead to disinvestment in the city’s private sector rental stock consigning hundreds of thousands of rent-regulated tenants to living in buildings that are likely to fall into disrepair,” Taxpayers for an Affordable New York, a coalition of four real estate groups, including the powerful Real Estate Board of New York, said in a statement.

    “This legislation will not create a single new affordable housing unit, improve the vacancy rate or improve enforcement against the few dishonest landlords who tend to dominate the headlines,” the statement added. “It is now up to the governor to reject this deal in favor of responsible rent reform that protects tenants, property owners, building contractors and our communities.”

    The agreement on Tuesday underscored the rising power of the progressive wing in Albany. Many of the lawmakers who fueled the Democratic takeover of the Senate last year pledged to decline contributions from real estate interests and ran on promises to take on the industry by passing legislation supported by tenant groups.

    Landlords and developers, accustomed to ready access to Albany insiders, were shut out of meetings and vilified at rallies.


    “None of these historic new tenant protections would be possible without the fact that New York finally has a united Democratic Legislature,” the legislative leaders said in their statement.

    As Saturday’s deadline loomed, tempers and tensions had risen. Last week, hundreds of activists flooded the State Capitol, staging a rowdy demonstration and leading to dozens of arrests.

    Anxiety over the deadline, and fighting among some Democrats, seemed to heighten the intensity surrounding the rent negotiations. On Tuesday, lawmakers and staff members huddled into the evening as they hashed out the final details on the legislation.

    Left uncertain was the involvement of Mr. Cuomo, an outsize figure in any negotiations in the capital, who won a third term in November.

    Tenant activists had urged the Democratic majorities in the Senate and the Assembly to shut out Mr. Cuomo, who has received millions of dollars in real estate campaign contributions. Though legislative leaders did not explicitly agree, Tuesday’s package was the product of two-way negotiations, according to a person familiar with the talks.

    Mr. Cuomo, at a news conference before the deal was announced, had dismissed the idea that he needed to be involved.

    “There is no negotiation. I will sign the best bill they can pass,” he said.

    He did not immediately comment after the Legislature’s deal.

    Encouraged by the Democratic takeover, a statewide coalition of tenants had been pressuring lawmakers for months to pass nine bills collectively known as “universal rent control.”

    The deal reached on Tuesday included several of those proposals or modified versions of them.

    Lawmakers agreed to abolish so-called vacancy decontrol, a provision that allows landlords to lift apartments out of regulation when their rents pass a certain threshold. The rule has led to the deregulation of more than 155,000 units since it was enacted in the 1990s.

    They also agreed to repeal the so-called vacancy bonus, which allows landlords to raise rents by up to 20 percent whenever a tenant moves out of a rent-stabilized apartment.

    And they pledged to rein in provisions that allow landlords to raise the rents of rent-regulated apartments when they renovate units or fix up buildings — perhaps the most hotly debated proposal of the package.

    Housing advocates have long argued that building owners routinely abuse those provisions, inflating construction costs to jack up rents and push out tenants.

    But Mr. Cuomo and Mayor Bill de Blasio of New York City said they supported revising the provisions, not repealing them, because they provide incentives for landlords to keep buildings in livable conditions. The real estate industry has argued the same.

    To combat abuse, the state would be required to inspect and audit a portion of buildingwide improvements.

    Additional changes would make permanent discounts on rents known as “preferential rents,” preventing landlords from sharply increasing those rents when a regulated tenant renews a lease.

    Only one component of the tenant activists’ platform was notably absent: a “good cause” eviction bill that would have made it considerably harder for landlords to evict tenants in most market-rate apartments statewide.

    But the Legislature did agree to limit security deposits on apartments statewide to one month’s rent and to provide tenants in eviction proceedings with more time to hire a lawyer, address lease violations and pay overdue rent.

    The legislation would also make it a punishable misdemeanor for landlords to evict tenants by illegally locking them out or through force.

    While tenant groups did not win total victory, they applauded the overall legislative package.

    “I think this is a huge win for the tenant movement that will impact the lives of millions of renters in a way that beats back the real estate industry,” said Jonathan Westin, the executive director of New York Communities for Change, an advocacy group. “But we also feel we have a long way to go.”

    Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/11/nyregion/rent-protection-regulation.html

  • 06/07/2019 7:23 PM | ACTION (Administrator)

    Culver City ranks 23rd in the nation for overall in average rental prices coming in at $3,958.89. That is 151.50 % above the average according to the list in Apartment Guide. Neighboring Santa Monica at $4716.25 per month.

    Four of Santa Monica's Westside neighbors also made the top 20 – West Hollywood was seventh, Playa Vista 12th, Marina del Rey 14th and Culver City 16th in the country. Los Angeles ranked 36th.

    Studios come in at $3098.60 with 1 Bedrooms close behind at $3131.84 while 2-bedrooms jump to $3958.89 in Culver City. Three Bedrooms in Culver City did not make the top 50 in the country and Santa Monica didn’t qualify for listing due to the small number of 3-Bedrooms available. Nationwide Hollywood topped the list $8,850.29 or 412.07 % above the national average.

    The report found that studios listed in Marina Del Rey and Culver City were third and fifth most expensive. Santa Monica averaged $2,958 a month, making Santa Monica the sixth most expensive studio market in the country.

    California held 7 of the top 10 spots for studios:

    1 Redwood City CA $3,361.65 163.28 %

    2 San Francisco CA $3,356.19 162.85 %

    3 Marina Del Rey CA $3,315.96 159.70 %

    4 New York NY $3,235.19 153.38 %

    5 Culver City CA $3,098.60 142.68 %

    6 Santa Monica CA $2,957.99 131.67 %

    7 Santa Clara CA $2,867.92 124.61 %

    8 Boston MA $2,848.86 123.12 %

    9 West Hollywood CA $2,825.22 121.27 %

    10 Weehawken NJ $2,801.53 119.41 %

    The list for 1 bedrooms has 13 of the top 16 cities in the country listed, with Santa Monica in the number five spot and Culver City at 16:

    1 New York NY $4,146.71 213.91 %

    2 San Francisco CA $3,854.25 191.77 %

    3 Mountain View CA $3,828.04 189.79 %

    4 Redwood City CA $3,794.36 187.24 %

    5 Santa Monica CA $3,786.04 186.61 %

    6 Menlo Park CA $3,594.50 172.11 %

    7 West Hollywood CA $3,590.78 171.83 %

    8 Boston MA $3,533.30 167.48 %

    9 Foster City CA $3,441.62 160.54 %

    10 Brighton MA $3,402.15 157.55 %

    11 Palo Alto CA $3,354.25 153.92 %

    12 Playa Vista CA $3,353.52 153.87 %

    13 San Bruno CA $3,303.62 150.09 %

    14 Marina Del Rey CA $3,286.06 148.76 %

    15 Santa Clara CA $3,226.91 144.28 %

    16 Culver City CA $3,131.84 137.08 %

    Santa Monica came in sixth in the two bedroom category while Culver City dropped to 23rd:

    1 New York NY $6,105.08 287.85 %

    2 Westwood CA $5,259.68 234.14 %

    3 Boston MA $4,953.64 214.70 %

    4 San Francisco CA $4,873.75 209.62 %

    5 Redwood City CA $4,784.86 203.98 %

    6 Santa Monica CA $4,716.25 199.62 %

    7 Mountain View CA $4,697.48 198.42 %

    8 Foster City CA $4,689.89 197.94 %

    9 Palo Alto CA $4,613.10 193.06 %

    10 Playa Vista CA $4,569.58 190.30 %

    11 Menlo Park CA $4,460.88 183.39 %

    12 West Hollywood CA $4,344.55 176.00 %

    13 Marina Del Rey CA $4,183.04 165.74 %

    14 Los Angeles CA $4,139.09 162.95 %

    15 Cambridge MA $4,120.03 161.74 %

    16 Brighton MA $4,113.44 161.32 %

    17 Channel Islands CA $4,097.14 160.29 %

    18 Oakland CA $4,096.68 160.26 %

    19 White Plains NY $4,032.65 156.19 %

    20 Newton MA $4,027.27 155.85 %

    21 Mamaroneck NY $4,022.85 155.57 %

    22 Hollywood CA $3,977.87 152.71 %

    23 Culver City CA $3,958.89 151.50 %

    Interestingly Westwood, where UCLA is housed came in second most costly in the nation. The charts and rankings are courtesy of Apartment Guide.

    Source:  https://www.culvercityobserver.com/story/2019/06/06/news/culver-city-comes-in-with-the-top-rental-prices-in-the-country/8210.html

  • 06/06/2019 6:26 PM | ACTION (Administrator)

    By The Times Editorial Board

    Jun 06, 2019 | 1:55 PM

    Crisis? What crisis? California refuses to protect renters even as homelessness surges

    A vigil in the Koreatown neighborhood of Los Angeles for Joe Reyes, 56, who died from a heart attack after being evicted, and forced to live in a tent on the sidewalk. (Los Angeles Times)

    California politicians have spent the last year wringing their hands over the state’s worsening homeless crisis. But when it came time to act — to take real steps to protect people from losing their homes because of an exorbitant rent increase or an unwarranted eviction — lawmakers were missing in action.

    Last week, the Assembly let a bill die that would have required landlords to show "just cause" — such as a failure to pay rent or a lease violation — before they could evict a renter. An anti-gouging bill designed to stop excessive rent increases was so watered down that it will be practically ineffectual. Other efforts to let cities expand rent control and track evictions were quietly killed.

    This is an outrageous abdication of responsibility at a moment when homelessness is getting worse across the state. From the Bay Area to Southern California, counties have reported double-digit increases in the number of people living in cars, tents, shelters and on the streets — spurred, almost everyone agrees, by a lack of low-income housing, unaffordable rent hikes, unjustified evictions and a lack of comprehensive tenant protections.

    Certainly California has to build more housing, and particularly affordable housing, whether by providing developers with incentives or subsidies for construction. But it will take years to construct enough housing to meet demand and to bring down prices. In the meantime, California has to do much more to ensure that people living on the edge financially don’t get unfairly or arbitrarily pushed out of their homes.

    Nowhere is the growing humanitarian crisis more visible than in Los Angeles County. Over the last year, officials have spent $600 million to build homes and shelters, and to provide services; they have housed a record number of homeless people. Yet numbers released this week showed that homelessness is up 12%. Why? Because even as we house people, more people are becoming homeless — often for the first time.

    Roughly one in three units in Los Angeles County is covered by some kind of rent control, according to a 2018 analysis. That leaves the majority of renters with no protection if a landlord wants to jack up the rent or boot them out. A few local governments around the state are beginning to take steps to protect tenants by enacting temporary rent caps and just-cause eviction laws, and by funding lawyers to help tenants fight unjust evictions.

    But those efforts are limited — both by local politics (renters may be the majority in many cities but they lack homeowners’ political sway) and by state law, which bars cities from extending rent control to apartments built after 1995, as well as houses and condos.

    To appease the powerful real estate interests who, apparently, control Sacramento, Assemblyman David Chiu (D-San Francisco) was forced to weaken his anti-rent gouging bill. It will now cap annual rent increases at 7% plus inflation and last just three years.

    That’s better than the status quo, but it is far from sufficient. State lawmakers and Gov. Gavin Newsom need to get serious and do more than pay lip service to tenant protections.

    Source: https://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-homeless-crisis-tenant-protections-20190606-story.html

  • 06/06/2019 2:58 PM | ACTION (Administrator)

    Democrats hold a supermajority—but failed to exercise any of their power to fix the housing crisis

    By Alissa Walker@awalkerinLA

    May 31, 2019, 3:35pm PDT

    On November 12, 2018, California’s Democrats stared down a remarkable opportunity. They had not only snagged a legislative trifecta—both houses of government and the governorship all from the same party—but a supermajority. With the two-thirds of votes in place needed to approve fiscal policy, and an incoming governor who promised to make housing his top priority, anything seemed possible.

    “Expect them to swing for the fences,” predicted Los Angeles Times columnist George Skelton shortly after the landmark election.

    They swung—and they struck out.

    Democratic lawmakers hold the fate of the state in their hands. But six months in, May might very well go down as the worst month in California’s housing policy history.

    It seemed, at first, like May might have been a turning point. Over the last few weeks, up and down the state, cities posted double-digit increases in their annual homeless counts. Promising a major initiative to tackle the problem, Gov. Gavin Newsom created a task force to study potential homelessness solutions.

    Meanwhile, a half dozen bills designed to alleviate the crisis began making their way through the legislature. State housing bills don't often make national headlines, but news out of California makes the Golden State a poster child for untenable inequality.

    The data reads like a pitch for a dystopian blockbuster: One out of every 11,600 San Franciscans is a billionaire, while one out of five Californians lives below the poverty level. In Los Angeles, housing costs have increased so much that the typical renter cannot afford the average rent, exacerbating the gap between the rich and the poor.

    Two-thirds of California voters supported Senate Bill 50, which would have increased building heights around transit and may have started to change that narrative by spurring more housing. But the bill was shelved by one of Southern California’s own.

    “This isn’t the right fix at this time to do that,” said Sen. Anthony Portantino, who held up the bill as the chairman of the appropriations committee.

    Portantino’s district is threaded by the Gold Line along its southern border, and includes wealthy cities like La Cañada Flintridge, which, while he served as its mayor, did not build a single apartment.

    Whether it was the “right fix,” because the discourse was dominated by wealthy homeowners moaning about SB 50 (and the lawmakers who listened to them), it’s possible that many Californians failed to grasp the importance of legislation with basic rental protections to keep more people out of homelessness. A number of bills, if passed intact and made law, might have started changing lives immediately.

    One by one, the other housing bills—like Assemblymember Richard Bloom’s Assembly Bill 36, which would have loosened the state’s existing rent control restrictions, and bills that might have protected tenants’ right to organize and made it tougher to evict tenants for no legitimate reason—all toppled like dominoes.

    Only Assembly Bill 1482 survived, but it was gutted. A cap on rent hikes now offers three years of protection instead of the original 10, making it too watered-down to be as effective as intended.

    And where was the governor, who wants to create 3.5 million homes for Californians? His staff falsely claimed he had expressed legislative support for the suite of bills that would help renters stay in their homes.

    “He’s asked them to move every single one of these bills,” Newsom’s chief of staff said. He hadn’t, the same way he hadn’t expressed support for Proposition 10, the rent control-strengthening ballot measure to repeal Costa Hawkins, which, had it passed, would have prevented much of the May massacre.

    Amid the carnage, a few housing bills did advance—including a tax credit for people who own historic or architecturally significant buildings. Sen. Toni Atkins, the president pro tem of the senate, the only person who had the power to reverse Portantino’s decision, brokered a deal not only to preserve the state’s most expensive real estate, but to give the state’s wealthiest homeowners additional money to do so.

    The irony was too painful to bear. But these state bills don’t represent the only failure in government. At the city level, May was even worse.


    The first HHH-funded building opened on Thursday, 933 days after Los Angeles voters approved the ballot measure that was promised $1.2 billion bond to tackle its home-grown homelessness crisis. The slower the city moves, the fewer units will be produced: Once intended to fund 10,000 units of supportive housing, the HHH figure might now be closer to 6,000, due to increased construction costs and neighborhood opposition.

    Even 6,000 units won’t be enough. Local homelessness numbers will be released next week, and we already know, according to a statement from the mayor, to also expect “some double-digit increases.” That’s with the city housing 16,500 people.

    Even with last year’s count showing a slight decrease, with 31,516 homeless residents in the city of Los Angeles, the most conservative double-digit increase would mean that over the last year, at least 10 more people became homeless in LA every single day.

    If it takes the city almost 1,000 days to build 49 permanent supportive units, that math isn’t going to work. The estimated 600,000 LA County residents who are spending 90 percent of their income on rent will become next year’s homeless. And still, some members of City Council—who unanimously opposed SB 50—still can’t bring themselves to build 222 units of supportive housing by next July. Additionally, 15 emergency shelters were supposed to be open or under construction by now. Only four have opened.

    Yes, the transit-oriented communities program shows promise in experimenting with inclusionary zoning, but not a single one of those projects has been completed yet. Yes, the number of ADU permits skyrocketed, but we don’t know if, ultimately, those structures will become housing—or backyard yoga studios. And with rising costs of construction, it’s not clear how many of those units will be delivered to the rental market.

    If we continue to rely on a handful of the wealthiest California property owners to keep the lives of tens of thousands of Angelenos intact, there will be no immediate solution to this problem.

    The crisis calls for dramatic measures, words that have not been uttered in Los Angeles City Council chambers: vacancy tax, land tax, billionaire tax, rent freeze, universal basic income (like the program being tested in Stockton). Modular shelter structures that can go up within a week. Mandatory safe parking provided on every city-owned parking lot.

    We don’t need 15 bridge housing facilities—we need 1,500. You don’t get to divvy up the impact of the crisis by 15 councilmembers and dole out gold stars to the handful that build emergency shelters.

    These are not new ideas, and they are not particularly controversial in other cities and states. New Orleans reduced its homeless population by 90 percent with a combination of housing-first outreach and a rental-assistance fund. Minneapolis passed a law legalizing fourplexes citywide. California’s housing bills were inspired in part by Oregon’s similar policy package that passed sweeping tenant protections in March.

    In the middle of California’s very bad month, New York Times columnist Farhad Manjoo surveyed the situation in appropriately dire terms: “The problems of affordable housing and homelessness have surpassed all superlatives—what was a crisis is now an emergency that feels like a dystopian showcase of American inequality.”

    Manjoo blamed wealthy liberals. Slate’s Henry Grabar blamed Boomers. The tech industry is always easy to blame. But as San Francisco-based housing advocate Randy Shaw told the Bay City Beacon, the blame lies squarely on the supermajority: “It wasn’t the Republican party that destroyed this,” he said. “It was all Democrats.”

    The blame must be levied at those in power, who hold the power to protect seniors, immigrants, students, veterans, children, people living with disabilities. These are the people who are facing eviction, harassment, chronic illness, hunger, and death. Today, in their districts. This is the sole priority of our lawmakers right now—serving our poorest and most vulnerable Californians.

    Source: https://la.curbed.com/2019/5/31/18647381/california-housing-homelessness-crisis-bills?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Curbed%20LA%20%202019-06-06%201700%20-0400%20%20Osmosys%20Campaign%202270&utm_content=Curbed%20LA%20%202019-06-06%201700%20-0400%20%20Osmosys%20Campaign%202270+CID_985d520250595b9c45a5e05e3e185188&utm_source=cm_email&utm_term=The%20May%20massacre%20of%20Californias%20housing%20bills

  • 06/05/2019 5:50 PM | ACTION (Administrator)

    By Pamela Ferdinand | Jun 5, 2019

    rent-too-high JOSH EDELSON/AFP/Getty Images

    When Stasha Powell moved into her one-bedroom apartment in Redwood City, CA, about 26 miles south of San Francisco, the rent was $625 per month. That was 17 years ago.

    Today, Powell, 44, faces a rent set to increase within months to $2,600—more than double her current rate of $1,040. And that’s for a 450-square-foot, unfurnished, non-air-conditioned unit in a building with an electrical system so outdated she can’t operate a microwave or even a blow dryer.

    Powell says the unprecedented jump in monthly payments leaves her with only one option: to move. Five other tenants will be out by the end of the summer, too, after reaching a confidential agreement with the building’s new owners, she says. The former affordable-housing loan specialist, who lives on her own and has autoimmune health issues, is on disability.

    Related Articles

    “The closer it gets to the day I have to get out, the more difficult it gets,” says Powell. “I never wanted to leave. It’s my home.”

    As tenants across the nation find themselves in similar straits, lawmakers and activists are pushing rent control and other tenant protection measures as states and local communities struggle to address the dearth of affordable housing. This is the first time in recent years that so many states, including Oregon, California, and Illinois, have considered or taken action at once. Some proposals would overturn existing bans on rent control. Others would establish rent control, expand existing laws, or introduce other types of protections.

    The national median rental price of a two-bedroom apartment is $1,185 as of April 30, according to the rental site Apartment List. That's a 1.5% annual rise. However, many cities have seen much higher increases. And those just barely making ends meet are struggling to find—and then keep—a roof over their heads.

    What’s astounding about the proposed reform is the breadth of it, says Mark Willis, senior policy fellow with New York University's Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy.

    “Something very different is going on now, because the pressure on housing costs is so great in so many places, not just in the cities,” he says.

    Stasha Powell outside her apartment in Redwood City, CA. Stasha Powell outside her apartment in Redwood City, CA.

    Lisa Wong

    As rents surge, more states and cities get involved

    Some of the most expensive states, particularly in the high-priced West, have been leading the charge for renter protections.

    In February, Oregon became the first state in the nation to impose statewide limits on how much landlords can raise rents. The move was a response to the surge in median rents in recent years.

    With some tenants in southwest Portland, OR, reporting increases of 350%, “Oregon couldn’t ignore it anymore,” says Katrina Holland, executive director of the Community Alliance of Tenants. The new legislation would generally cap increases at 7% annually, plus inflation, while exempting new construction for 15 years.

    Colorado passed laws in May to give renters more rights, including providing more notice before evictions.

    Meanwhile, in California, where a ballot measure to expand rent control failed last November, lawmakers are weighing bills to increase protections for tenants. They include proposed legislation that would prevent all owners of residential properties statewide from raising rents more than 5% a year after inflation. In addition, a new rent control initiative is expected to be put forward as a statewide ballot in 2020.

    Illinois is considering repealing its ban on rent control. And Democrats in New York, where rent regulation laws are set to expire June 15, are considering nine bills to protect rent-stabilized and other renters. One would repeal vacancy control, which allows landlords to deregulate rent-stabilized apartments and charge market rent once the cost reaches a certain limit and the occupant leaves. Another would eliminate a provision that allows owners to pass on some costs of building-wide improvements to tenants through permanent rent increases.

    Tenants and activists in cities such as Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, Providence, and Washington, DC, have also rallied for stronger tenant protections. In March, New York City extended its rent regulation laws through April 2021. And Long Beach, CA, where rents have jumped more than 25% in the past five years, now will require landlords who own four or more units to compensate tenants who move out, to help them deal with rent increases of more than 10% a year.

    “More and more cities [outside New York City] are experiencing housing affordability crises, so it makes sense that this is something that is coming up as a way to address that,” says Elizabeth Ginsburg, a senior program officer in the New York office of Enterprise Community Partners, a national affordable housing and community development nonprofit.

    “At stake is ensuring some level of tenant protection and affordability for particular housing stock but also being cognizant of what is required in order to operate a building, especially an older building,” she says.

    From 2005 to 2015, the number of units renting for $2,000 or more per month increased by 97%, according to a 2017 study by Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies. Meanwhile, the share renting for less than $800 declined by 2% over the same period. The same report notes that while the overall rental stock increased by more than 6.7 million housing units, the number of units renting for less than $800 declined by more than 260,000.

    The magnitude of the crisis is such that it has shifted beyond local politics to where state and national political candidates are making affordable housing policy a key part of their platforms, the Furman Center's Willis notes. Their proposals include renter tax credits, increased federal funding for housing construction, and measures to reform local zoning.

    Rent regulation can hurt both big and small landlords

    Landlords as well as industry organizations, including the National Association of Realtors®, argue that rent control makes the problem of housing affordability worse. They say that it overburdens and discourages landlords, and fails to address other issues limiting supply, such as zoning and high land costs.

    Elaine Golden-Gealer, a Realtor in Santa Monica, CA, is one of those frustrated landlords. The number of available rentals in the area have plummeted as smaller building owners, frustrated by meager profits and burdensome regulations, have moved out of the market. That left professional investors and developers an opportunity to move in.

    As a local landlord herself for more than 40 years, Golden-Gealer estimates she lost $250,000 to $300,000 in potential income from just one rent-controlled unit that was occupied for most of that time. When her tenants finally moved, she spent $30,000 remodeling the unit and was able to raise the rent from $1,100 to $2,850 a month.

    It’s "almost impossible to own" a rental property," she says. “Every single month, they have a new regulation or rule that protects tenants but has nothing to do with protecting owners, and many are leaving the business.”

    On the other hand, rent-control advocates say it's an easy and effective way to provide relief to people who would otherwise be priced out of their homes. Nearly half of the nation's 43 million renters are “cost-burdened,” meaning they spend at least 30% of their income on housing and may have difficulty affording other necessities, according to the Joint Center report.

    In Santa Monica, for instance, where median initial rents have hit record highs, a one-bedroom unit or larger would require a household income of more than $100,000 to meet HUD affordability standards, according to the local Rent Control Board's 2018 annual report.

    The tenant toll

    Jessica Hoehn, 51, an insurance agent who lives in downtown Orlando, FL, knows she’s one of the more fortunate tenants in a city where rents are rising faster than anywhere else in the country. She pays less than $1,400 for a dated 1,100-square-foot townhouse with two bedrooms and one bath. She makes her own repairs so she doesn't have to ask too much of her landlord.

    “If you’re making $40,000 a year, you have to have a roommate in order to be able to afford anything around here,” Hoehn says. “If I had to leave today, then I’d be paying $1,200 for a studio or one-bedroom.”

    In response to the skyrocketing rents, two Orlando lawmakers tried unsuccessfully to pass legislation that would have given cities and counties more power to put local caps in place. The Redwood City Council in California, meanwhile, unanimously passed two ordinances requiring landlords with rental properties of more than three units to offer minimum one-year lease terms. In certain circumstances, they also must help pay for the relocation of eligible displaced tenants.

    Those changes, which took effect at the beginning of the year, won’t help Powell or others who see the housing crunch as only getting worse. Once known as “Deadwood City,” Redwood now boasts a new Google campus; the software development company Informatica; and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, the charitable company of the founder of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, and his wife, Priscilla Chan.

    Powell has shifted gears, too. She’s co-leader of Fair Rents for Redwood City and a member of the city’s Historic Resources Advisory Committee. Whether or not she can find an affordable place to live within city limits, however, remains to be seen.

    “It’s my home, so I’m trying,” she says. “My whole life is here.”

    Pamela Ferdinand is a freelance journalist, author, and editor based in the Chicago area.

    The realtor.com® editorial team highlights a curated selection of product recommendations for your consideration; clicking a link to the retailer that sells the product may earn us a commission.

    Source: https://www.realtor.com/news/trends/the-rent-is-too-high-so-help-is-on-the-way-in-many-cities-states/

  • 06/01/2019 8:22 PM | ACTION (Administrator)

    (Credit: Getty Images)

    Protesters in Spain (Credit: Getty Images)

    Housing costs have jumped more than 50% in the last 5 years

    As Americans grapple with how to impose rent control measures in large cities like Los Angeles and New York, lawmakers in Europe are wasting no time in addressing the problem.

    Officials in Barcelona passed a new measure that requires landlords to negotiate leases based on benchmark prices that depend on the neighborhood, Bloomberg reported. The prices will be based on an area’s desirability, allowing landlords with properties in more popular neighborhoods to charge higher rent.

    Rents in Spain’s biggest cities, such as Barcelona and Madrid, have been rising steadily as foreign investors buy more apartments in the area. Blackstone, for example, has invested billions of dollars in the country since the 2012 financial crash. From 2014 to 2017, rents in Barcelona and Madrid rose by 60 percent.

    The rent control law comes two months after state lawmakers passed another law that caps annual rent hikes at the rate of inflation. Inflation in Spain is currently at 1.5 percent. For comparison, landlords of rent-controlled units in L.A. are able to increase rents up to 4 percent annually.

    Barcelona isn’t the only European city that’s taken strides to curb rising prices. A referendum initiative known as “Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen and Co,” aimed at converting 200,000 homes into social housing has been gaining momentum in Berlin. The proposal would affect 10 companies, each of which owns at least 3,000 units in the city. [Bloomberg] — Natalie Hoberman

    Read the Article at: https://therealdeal.com/national/2019/06/01/renters-in-barcelona-score-major-victory-with-new-rent-control-law/

  • 05/31/2019 9:09 AM | Margaret Fulton (Administrator)

    The bulk of new spending in the City of Santa Monica’s proposed budget will go toward improving transportation and fighting climate change.

    The biennial budget City Manager Rick Cole released last Thursday proposes spending $38 million on various mobility projects and $29 million on water sustainability and electric vehicle charging next fiscal year. Under the proposed budget, the City would also spend $4 million on park safety enhancements, a criminal prosecution case management system and a staging facility for the Santa Monica Police Department.

    Read More: https://www.smdp.com/budget-trims-17-3m-in-city-spending/175946

  • 05/30/2019 9:05 AM | Margaret Fulton (Administrator)

    A proposed educational garden and kitchen at 4th Street and Montana Avenue will be able to hold frequent classes and fundraisers despite concerns from neighbors about noise, light and traffic.

    City Council voted unanimously Tuesday to double the number of small events the Rainbow Garden will be allowed to hold, rejecting an appeal from residents that asked the garden to hold only classes and fundraisers, go dark by 9 p.m. on weeknights and 10 p.m. on weekend nights, and close on weekends and holidays. The appeal also argued that the garden’s fence should be transparent for better integration with the neighborhood and requested that parking for events larger than 50 people be provided offsite.

    Read More: https://www.smdp.com/we-feel-children-are-disconnected-from-food-because-they-dont-get-that-experience-we-want-to-offer-with-the-garden/175911

  • 05/30/2019 8:59 AM | Margaret Fulton (Administrator)

    A spokesman for the Los Angeles County Dept of Public Health, confirms two cases of typhus in Santa Monica in the last year. He said they have found typhus in Santa Monica in the past, on rats, feral cats and opossums. It has not recently found cases in people.

    There is a concern that they could be transmitted from the animals to people sleeping in the park, by way of fleas. Another concern is shelter workers, who could contract disorders from animals.

    Read More: https://www.smobserved.com/story/2019/05/29/news/pets-or-wild-animals-could-transmit-typhus-to-people-in-los-angeles-county/3991.html

  • 05/30/2019 8:40 AM | Margaret Fulton (Administrator)

    Santa Monica will likely tighten its belt by scaling back or eliminating underused programs at community centers, swimming pools and schools, City officials said Wednesday.

    The cutbacks are part of a strategy for the proposed 2019-21 Biennial Budget that calls for using general fund money to pay $16.6 million towards the City's pension debt.

    Read More: http://surfsantamonica.com/ssm_site/the_lookout/news/News-2019/May-2019/05_29_2019_City_Officials_Propose_Trims_to_Community_Programs.html

Copyright ©2025 ACTION Apartment Association, Inc.

Equal Opportunity Housing
Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software